Maple Leafs Coaching Search Should Become Much Bigger

2 min read• Published May 14, 2026 at 10:55 a.m.
Featured image
Logo Crest

Now that the Toronto Maple Leafs have moved on from Craig Berube, everybody immediately jumps to the obvious question: Who’s next? But honestly, the most interesting part of this process might not even be who gets hired. It might be everything the Maple Leafs learn along the way.

There’s much to be learned from the process of interviewing coaching candidates.

Whenever a team interviews coaches, fans usually treat it like a simple hiring competition. One guy wins the job, and everybody else goes home. But smart organizations can use these interviews for something much bigger. Every coach who walks into the room brings a different philosophy, perspective, and ideas about leadership, systems, culture, player relationships, development, accountability, scouting, and team-building. Even the candidates you don’t hire can teach you something valuable about your own organization.

That’s why the Maple Leafs should probably cast a very wide net here. If it were me, I’d bring in two or three of the smartest hockey minds in the organization and let them sit through every interview. Not just to evaluate coaches, but to gather information. One coach might identify flaws in the defensive structure. Another may see problems in player development. Somebody else may talk about leadership issues, sports psychology, or how the organization communicates internally. Over time, patterns would start to emerge. If five smart hockey people independently point out the same weakness, you probably should pay attention.

A coaching search could become an organizational external audit.

Weirdly, a coaching search becomes an organizational self-scouting exercise. You’re not just asking, “Who should coach this team?” You’re asking, “What kind of team are we trying to become?”

And honestly, it would almost feel wasteful not to use the process this way. These are experienced hockey people giving you an outside evaluation for free. Most organizations spend significant sums hiring consultants to do exactly this kind of analysis. The Maple Leafs are about to have some of the best hockey minds in the sport voluntarily walking through the door. Why not listen carefully?

Chayka and Sundin have a real opportunity to listen to intelligent hockey minds. They should take it.

That’s part of why this process under John Chayka and Mats Sundin feels so important. The coaching search is underway alongside front-office changes, organizational reviews, player meetings, and scouting evaluations. Everything is interconnected right now. The Maple Leafs are not simply replacing a coach. They’re trying to redefine how the entire organization operates.

And maybe that’s the real opportunity here. The next coach matters, obviously. But the conversations surrounding the search might end up shaping the Maple Leafs just as much as the eventual hire itself.

Related: If the Oilers Let Knoblauch Go, the Maple Leafs Should Move