Red Wings 4, Canucks 0: Gibson Steals the Whole Show

2 min read• Published December 9, 2025 at 8:46 a.m.
Featured image
Logo Crest

The 4–0 loss to the Detroit Red Wings was one of those for the Vancouver Canucks. They came out fast — outshot Detroit 10–2 early, carried the puck well, created chances, and still walked into the first intermission down 1–0. From there, the night slowly slipped away. John Gibson simply slammed every door the Canucks tried to open, and by the time Dylan Larkin’s empty-net goal rolled in late, it felt like the whole evening had been one long, frustrating chase.

This wasn’t one of those “flat start, flat finish” games. The Canucks actually played a good chunk of the first 30 minutes with pace and pressure. Quinn Hughes was skating like he was trying to drag the team forward all by himself, and Jake DeBrusk had two terrific looks. Neither went in. And when you’re already struggling to score — two wins in ten games will do that — seeing chance after chance swallowed up can feel like pushing uphill with both skates pointed the wrong way.

Then Detroit hit that quick one-two punch late in the second: Andrew Copp, then Nate Danielson 37 seconds later. Both came off clean passing plays, both with too much space in front of the net. At 3–0, that was the ballgame.

Key Point One: The Red Wings’ John Gibson Turned Everything Aside

John Gibson didn’t just post a shutout — he stole one. His 39 saves felt like 60 because so many came early, or right after a Canucks push. Jake DeBrusk alone probably walked away wondering how he didn’t have two. When a goalie plays at that “nothing goes in tonight” level, you tip your cap and curse quietly on the bench.

Key Point Two: Vancouver’s Finishing Problems Continue

The Canucks created enough to be in this game. They couldn’t finish. Not the crossbar chance, not the rebound, not the backdoor look. Quinn Hughes said afterward they’re needing “10 or 15 looks to score,” and it felt true. This team isn’t quitting — but it isn’t capitalizing either.

Key Point Three: Defensive Breakdowns Prove Costly

For all the offensive frustration, it was the Canucks’ breakdowns in their own end that broke the game open. Detroit’s second and third goals came off missed coverages and slow reads. Kevin Lankinen didn’t have much of a chance on either one. Vancouver can’t afford those lapses right now.

Final Thoughts from the Canucks Perspective

The Canucks didn’t get goalie’d — they got Gibson’d, which is its own category. But even with the big saves and the bad bounces, Vancouver has to clean up the middle of the ice and find some confidence finishing plays. The road map is there. The execution is not.

The good news? Elias Pettersson should be close to returning from an injury, and Thatcher Demko returns on Thursday. Suddenly, that could steady everything. But for now, the Canucks are still stuck in that frustrating in-between: generating enough to believe… but not enough to win.

Related: Remembering Alex Edler: Blueprint for Canucks Defencemen