The Maple Leafs Made a Choice: Offence or Playoff Depth?

2 min read• Published July 19, 2026 at 11:03 a.m.
Featured image
Logo Crest

Recently, I read a post expressing concern about the Toronto Maple Leafs’ bottom-six forwards. If the question is, “Who is going to replace the offence lost when Mitch Marner and others moved on?” there are legitimate questions.

Jack Roslovic is not a 70-point player. Colton Sissons is not being brought in to create offence. Teddy Blueger and Brandon Duhaime are not going to carry a scoring line.

But I think the post misses the kind of team GM John Chayka was trying to build.

The Maple Leafs did not spend the offseason trying to recreate their regular-season offence. They spent it trying to build a team that could survive the type of hockey that has ended their seasons year after year. That means adding players who can win faceoffs, kill penalties, play physically, protect a lead, and handle difficult minutes.

And this is where the comparison becomes interesting. The Florida Panthers didn’t win the Stanley Cup because their fourth line was filled with 20-goal scorers. They won because every line could make life difficult for opponents. They had depth players who could contribute in different ways. That appears to be the blueprint Chayka is following.

Related: Roslovic vs. Mantha? Did the Maple Leafs Prioritize Fit?

The Maple Leafs won’t replace Marner’s offence — but they might win anyway.

The question is not whether Roslovic, Sissons, Blueger, and Duhaime will replace Marner’s offence. They won’t. But that’s not the question. The question is whether the Maple Leafs will be a better playoff team because they have fewer passengers when the games become harder.

Last season, Toronto often looked like a team that had enough talent at the top but not enough balance throughout the lineup. When opponents tightened defensively, the Leafs needed every goal they could find from their stars. This offseason suggests a different philosophy: build a stronger foundation and ask the stars to provide the finishing.

There are risks to Chayka’s plan for the Maple Leafs.

There are still risks. If Auston Matthews and William Nylander do not return to elite offensive form, or if Easton Cowan struggles in a larger role, this lineup could absolutely have scoring issues. But predicting a bottom-six failure because those players are not offensive drivers might be judging them by the wrong measurement.

The Maple Leafs are not trying to win October scoring races anymore. They are trying to become the team nobody wants to face in April. Whether that works is the bigger and more fascinating question.

Related: What Does the Jim Hiller Hire Say About the Maple Leafs?