Would Patrik Laine Be Worth the Risk for the Maple Leafs?

2 min read• Published June 6, 2026 at 9:11 a.m.
Featured image
Logo Crest

I know what a lot of Toronto Maple Leafs fans are probably thinking the second they see this name. Patrik Laine? Really?

And honestly, that reaction makes sense. This isn’t a clean, obvious fit or a “no-brainer” signing. This is one of those situations where you have to look hard and think in terms of upside, risk, and very specific usage.

Laine’s Risk-Reward Profile Isn’t Simple for the Maple Leafs

Because Laine comes with baggage — there’s no point pretending otherwise. Injuries have slowed him down, his five-on-five game has been questioned for years, and there are fair doubts about whether he can ever fully return to the level he showed early in his career. The version of Laine that looked like a pure goal-scoring machine hasn’t been consistently there in a while.

But the shot still shows up. Even in limited stretches with the Montreal Canadiens, Laine has reminded people that if you give him time and space on the power play, he can still absolutely rip the puck. Put him in his office, on his strong side, and he can beat NHL goalies cleanly. That kind of release doesn’t just disappear.

The Power Play Question Toronto Keeps Circling

That’s what makes this interesting for a team like Toronto. It raises a simple question: Is there still room in the NHL for a player who is almost entirely defined by one elite skill?

We’ve seen versions of this work before. Tyson Barrie, for example, wasn’t used as a shutdown defender when he was with the Edmonton Oilers. His value came from one thing — running a power play and producing offence in a very specific role. Nobody was under any illusions about his defensive game, but the offensive output made him useful in the right situation. Still, he put up 40 points during several NHL seasons.

Laine could be that type of bet, just on the forward side of things.

Why the Maple Leafs Might Actually Consider Laine

The key, of course, is price and structure. This is not a long-term commitment or a major cap swing. This only makes sense as a short-term, “prove it” type deal — ideally bonus-heavy, low risk, and easy to walk away from if it doesn’t work.

But if it did work, that’s where it gets interesting. Because the Maple Leafs don’t necessarily need Laine to be a 40-goal scorer or an everyday driver anymore. They just need more secondary scoring and another weapon on the power play. If he can rediscover even a portion of that elite finishing touch, it changes how opponents have to defend them.

And if he doesn’t? It’s one season. A calculated gamble. Nothing more.

Scoring doesn’t come easy in the NHL these days.

The reality in today’s NHL is that high-end goal scoring is hard to find, especially on bargain deals. Sometimes the smartest moves aren’t the safe ones — they’re the ones where the upside is worth the risk.

Laine might fall into that category. Not a cornerstone or a saviour. Just a low-cost swing on a player who still has one elite skill that can change a game in a single shot.

Related: The Real Knies Question: What Problem Was Treliving Trying to Solve? and What the McKenna Conversation Says About the Draft Process